|

Freedom by Friday Archives

|
|
11-16-09
Make or Break
Scoreboard year to date: Dow up
16.76%, S&P up 21.01%, gold up 24.7%
Try a fun experiment:
ask everyone you know when you next
see them if they own any gold coins
and watch their faces go blank.
We sit at a
critical fork in the road regarding
the stock market now (remember, what
happens in the stock market affects
everything right down to consumer
attitudes).
So far, this market has
recaptured approximately half of
what it lost from the peak in 2007
to the bottom last March. This 50%
rebound is a significant number
because it's an historical precedent
that was expected. Most market
crashes are followed by a rebound of
30-50% as sure as it snows in Alaska
in winter.
This happened in 1930
after the great crash of 1929 but
then stocks slid into a deceptive,
grinding downwards cycle which
culminated 3 years later with an
overall 80% drop from the 1929 peak
(yes, 80%). If you apply the exact
example to today, the Dow would be
at 2,840 in 2012.
That would be a nice send
off for comrade Obama, wouldn't it?
But I really hope it doesn't happen.
It'll be bad enough for the poor guy
to be a one-term president, let
alone going out on such a
humiliating note where all he's
remembered for is burning the
savings of our grandchildren to
fight a natural economic cycle.
Don't think he'll be a one-termer?
I'll take that bet when you're ready
(and any Democrats reading this,
please, I'm not a Republican either.
I just want to be left alone.)
So we're at the upper
limit of the expected rebound and
one would now presume the grinding
down to start if history is any
guide. So we all go short the market
now and then retire happily ever
after, right?
Not so fast...
This scenario playing out
is based on the assumption that this
is in fact a bear market rally and
not a new bull market. There are
many respected analysts who believe
the latter to be the case. If it's
true, then the market will instead
be off to the races leaving a wake
of dead bears in its path and we can
all go back to normal.
So who to believe?
As usual, we must listen
to the market itself when it's at a
critical point like this with lots
of conflicting opinion. Long-time
subscribers will know I'm talking
about using Dow Theory (new
subscribers may want to look at past
issues to learn more).
Dow Theory drowns out
all the 'noise' and pays attention
only to the market, namely two
markets: the Dow Jones Industrials
and the Dow Jones Transportation
index. As one index reaches a new
high (or low) it must be confirmed
by the other index also reaching a
new high (or low) within a
reasonable period of time. What's a
reasonable period of time? Good
question, but the longer time passes
without a confirmation, the less
valid and strong such a confirmation
would be if and when it does happen
(anymore than a month would be
weak).
So let's apply this to
the current situation and read
between the lines of what the market
itself is telling us...
The Dow Jones INDUSTRIAL
hit a recent high of 10,291 BUT it
has not yet been confirmed by the
TRANSPORTS doing the same. The Dow
Transports need to CLOSE at above
4,045 for that to happen. If this
occurs and Dow Theory isn't sending
a false signal (through market
manipulation), the bull market may
well be back on.
You can view the daily action of the
Dow Transports at
http://money.cnn.com/data/markets/dowtrans/
As I write, Transports
are about 90 points below 4,045. And
remember, the numbers only apply at
the market CLOSE, not intraday highs
or lows.
I believe the time has
come where bulls and bears alike
will have to 'put up or shut up'.
And this is no normal
market turning point; I believe
we're at the most critical market
turning point of this generation.
Another turning point
I'm closely watching for you is what
we discussed last time- how the Fed
maintaining its independence is the
difference between the critical
investment question facing us all
now: inflation or deflation?
This from Bloomberg...
"The Federal Reserve
faces the biggest blows to its
authority and independence in five
decades under legislation championed
by its lead overseer in the U.S.
Senate.
The financial-regulation
overhaul proposed yesterday by
Senator Christopher Dodd would strip
the Fed of its role as a bank
supervisor and give Congress a
greater voice in naming the
officials who set interest rates.
The measure opens the door to
interference from politicians who
might disagree with any move by the
Fed to raise rates from record lows,
former central bank officials said.
Dodd's measure would
also curb the Fed's ability to make
emergency loans to individual
companies. The Fed's response to the
financial crisis prompted increased
scrutiny of the central bank,
especially after it used its
emergency powers to bail out Bear
Stearns Cos. and
American International Group Inc.
The proposal comes as
Fed Chairman
Ben S. Bernanke,
55, awaits confirmation to a second
term. The hearings will be held some
time between the Nov. 26
Thanksgiving holiday and year's end
by Dodd, the Connecticut Democrat
who chairs the banking committee.
Dodd said in a Bloomberg
Television interview today that he
"tends to be supportive" of Bernanke.
Yesterday Dodd said his proposal is
"not about individuals and
personalities. It's about putting
together an architecture that makes
sense."
Under the 1,136-page
proposal, the Fed would lose its
bank- supervision role to a new
Financial Institutions Regulatory
Administration. Its consumer
oversight duties would go to a new
Consumer Financial Protection
Agency. An Agency for Financial
Stability would have broad powers to
protect the economy from financial
risks, with the Fed chairman holding
one of nine seats.
The Fed's regulation of
banks has been an "abysmal failure,"
Dodd said yesterday. He has blamed
it for not preventing the practices
that contributed to the financial
crisis and led to taxpayer bailouts
of firms including Bank of America
Corp. and Citigroup Inc."
This new agency (FIRA)
would be a government arm and
controlled by the whim of
politicians, like any government
agency.
Now, you may (rightly)
argue that the Fed is an evil agent
of Goldman Sachs et al in that its
creation was to do nothing but cause
inflation, they were the ones behind
this mess, they only look after
their banking buddies and no agency
should have such power.
All perhaps true, but
what's the alternative?
The Fed may well be all
those things but one thing it's not,
is as stupid as Congress- the people
at the Fed may have their own agenda
but they're not idiots and they know
that too much money-printing would
cause hyper-inflation. The Fed is a
much lesser of two evils. You'd
better hope and pray that the Fed
DOES keep its independence because
if the public-pandering,
vote-buying, sleaze-ball politicians
get hold of the printing press,
you'll wish all your money had been
in gold.
It's interesting to hear
about stories during the
hyper-inflation that recently
occurred in Argentina. Survivors
will tell you that what was so
shocking was how fast it happened
and seemingly without warning. A
packet of cigarettes was one price
in the morning and another in the
evening. Prices of even the most
basic items would be announced on
loud-speakers because the price was
changing so fast, a bit like
financial markets.
Could that happen here?
Or is that only confined to
banana-republics in South America
and Africa?
One thing's for sure, US
politicians aren't going to sit idly
by while their precious voters walk
up the Hill with pitchforks and
scream out louder and louder for
their 'right' to a job. Good luck to
the Fed keeping hold of the printing
press when that starts...
These two critical
precipices we sit at- the
inflation/deflation question and
stock market turning point will
define what happens in the next
decade; a decade that will make or
break you depending on your actions.
And of course, the two
are linked. If the stock market
turns decisively down from here and
deflation sets in putting the
economy in freefall again, public
pressure will demand action and the
politicians will respond (by
stealing the printing press).
Wow, when I put it like
that, an awful lot now seemingly
rests in the hands of that Dow
Transport index doesn't it?!
Notice how various
country's central banks are now net
BUYERS of gold rather than net
SELLERS as they have been for the
past years? What do they know that
we don't??
What I know is what
history knows: he who has the gold
has the power and that no paper
currency has ever stood the test of
time.
Please stay tuned.
History is in the making and I'm
your commentator.
Until next time,
Mark Patricks

Subscribe To Our Complimentary Newsletter "Freedom By Friday" &
Receive One Free Lesson To The Elite Membership "The League of
Power".
Through our membership and
complimentary newsletter you will learn the five secrets that
makes the difference between luxury living and eternal
servitude...
|
Instant Access
Please enter your name and a valid email
address to gain instant access to this
FREE report plus receive a
complimentary subscription to "Freedom
by Friday and One FREE Lesson of the
"League of Power". |
*Fields are
required.
We
dislike
spam just as much as you! We will never rent, sell or otherwise
share your information with anyone and you can unsubscribe at any time.
|
|